🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my life is saved on the platform, and unexpectedly they want us to pay for it."

Negative feedback and a sense of inequity have dominated digital forums since the messaging service emerged as the latest technology company to start charging for a service that users previously accessed for at no cost.

The app's parent company revealed in September that it would require payment from people if they have more than five gigabytes worth of previously shared pictures and clips stored as Memories.

For many, these past uploads function as a portal to bygone days – prompting some to blast the corporation of "money-hungry tactics" in comments on online platforms and unfavorable ratings on Google and Apple's app stores.

Other Choices

The company has compared its premium storage tiers to those provided by Apple and Google for smartphones.

For those seeking another option for those who don't want to pay, members can download their archived media – which for some span significant data – to their personal gadget.

The firm indicated that only a minority of users would be impacted by the updated terms.

The company admitted that it was "never easy to move from accessing content at no charge to covering the expense" – but suggested it would be "a valuable investment" for subscribers.

A significant number of opposing the change on the internet appear unconvinced.

Widespread Discontent

An online petition dubbed the charge a "memory tax", with commenters labeling it "dystopian" and "absurd" – while one person threatened never to use the application again.

At the same time, in a poor review on the digital platform, a user identifying as an online commenter said it felt "morally questionable".

"If I know millennials right, the majority have a long history of personal moments on the platform," they commented. "And most of us only continued using Snapchat mainly for this purpose. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have years worth of moments... Goodbye to the app."

And, a London-based user, a 20-year-old media studies major in a major city, shared on the video platform her decision to remove the app.

"I decided that I wanted to export all my archived media as immediately," she mentioned. "The vast majority of my teenage years have been documented through my archived posts, all of the images in there are really important to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to start charging individuals for a feature that has been at no cost for so many years."

Unknown Fees

Snapchat has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would require in the United Kingdom – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

But a London resident a different individual, who is based in the city, stated in a post on TikTok that she would be "upset" by these fees.

Amber explained that the platform had become "integrated into daily routine" since she first joined in 2014.

While she said she accepted the app needed to earn income, the user indicated that the saved content option is more valuable than the company may have realized.

"Personally, I believe it's a rather unjust move to impose fees on your users who have been loyal and devoted," she commented. "These are not merely labeled 'Memories', these are our actual memories."

Industry Perspective

Businesses opting to impose fees from subscribers for a service that was earlier without cost is nothing new, and numerous people subscribe to services like iCloud and Google Drive to preserve their images and clips from their handset.

The fact of storing data in the cloud – which certain experts in the technology sector like to refer to as essentially "an external server" – is that it costs money.

"Hosting trillions of Memories on the service isn't a trivial amount," online expert a tech commentator stated. "The company has to try to find a method to fund the operation of storage, bandwidth, back-ups, media distribution, data protection – the entire process."

Yet the expert indicated that requiring payment for a service that had previously been free, and subscribers had been prompted to utilize as such, may seem like a "deceptive practice" for many people.

"Changing the rules after users have built this huge digital archive seems unfair," he said. And for many, he continued, "Memories aren't just data dumps, they're personal mementos."

The sentiment was echoed by those leaving negative feedback, with a user labeling their saved images and clips "the most precious thing to me".

"The stored media includes each part of my life within them from celebrations of new family members' births, mourning of passed loved ones, memories with friends/family, [and] my entire youth," they expressed.

Research Perspective

A postdoctoral researcher, a research fellow at Utrecht University in the Holland, stated that the company's action highlights the implications of commercial platforms being used to archive sentimental personal content.

"Platforms gain from this trust, connected relationship, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even encourages some users to continue using the app or continue to use it in order to review their archive," she informed the media. "But these are not benevolent guardians of personal memory."